Thursday, April 29, 2010

I'm Starting to Panic! (But Not At The Disco!)

It sort of hit me tonight. I say sort of because it wasn't strong enough to change my life, but just to give me more perspective. In a little over two weeks, it's all over. After over 22 years, I will be done with the academic system and sent out into the "real world."

It's scary. It's real. It's coming up too fast. I'm not sure anyone is ever really ready. How do you know you're ready until you do it? That's what happens, you make mistakes and learn from them, or you flourish and keep developing.

I'm a big fan of the loss of innocence metaphor. It's the prime theme of some of the greatest novels of all time. Catcher in the Rye comes to mind. Holden Caulfield is the perfect example. This is the complete loss of innocence. No more living in fantasy land. No more summers where I can screw off and hang out on the beach all day as many days as possible and relax. No more.

It's depressing and exciting at the same time. I've really enjoyed the time I've spent - it's had many highs and many lows. Sometimes I'm not sure I want to give it up. It would be great to be a beach bum and make just enough money to get by but enjoy the time you have. I know people that have done it. I don't think that's what I've spent my time in college to do, so I think it's more of a fantasy "if I lived in an alternate reality" (or a flash sideways *LOST REFERENCE*) situation. It sounds lovely though.

You never know when you're ready to grow up. It just happens. I'm not saying that by graduating I'm growing up. I don't know when exactly it happens. It just does. I don't believe you really transition until you're out for a few years. And I mean really out, not living with your parents or some kind of convoluted program.

I'm not really sure the point of this blog post - this isn't supposed to be my diary. I'm sure that someone reading this can sympathize with me. I really want to enjoy the final 18 some days. I'm hoping I can find the perfect job that still allows me to be myself while learning and growing. I've got a few irons in the fire with job, but not enough. It's a big dive into the deep unknown. Who wants to jump with me?

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

iTunes Is Unreadable

Apple's taken over the world since the launch of the iPod and iTunes. It started off slow, just with music. Then it got music videos, then movies, then TV shows, then Apps, then books. What's next? Can I buy a headache? I think it's free.

Seriously, iTunes has become so much to navigate that I can't figure out where ANYTHING IS. It's actually painful. Apple has too much content to distribute.

I don't even know where to start, because I can't navigate the home page. How can I find new music? I miss the old artist pages where I could comprehend and learn a little about these artists, and see their top-10 (which sounds cheesy, but that's how I usually find new music by seeing what other people are listening too) It doesn't feel like the top-10 is relevant as much anymore - it's what iTunes wants you to think is relevant.

For example, this is what I see when I visit Green Day's Artist Page (I would take a picture, but the thing is so long that it would take 3 screen shots. I don't love you guys THAT much.)
Albums
Songs (based on Popularity as default)
Music Videos
Movies

Too many things! Have tabs for each one!

Honestly, my ideal solution would be to edit the tabs along the side of the iTunes bar (where there's library and playlists.) Tab for Music, tab for Video, tab for Music Video, tab for Podcast, tab for Apps, tab for Headaches. etc. PLEASE

Apples become too much of a mega-distributor. We've all bought into and eaten the Apple pie and now we're stuck. I don't see any way out, so I'm just hoping they can clean up a little bit, soon, because I hate it right now. And I don't say hate that often.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

My Social Network "Friend" Rules

This post was powered by last Wednesday's episode of South Park focusing on social networking, specifically Facebook. South Park always does a good job of providing some kind of perspective on current event issues. I may not always agree with their message and may not always laugh at how obscene/bizarre their jokes are, but I think there is a message.

Anyway, the concept was how people take Facebook/social networks too seriously. How many friends you have vs. me, why am I not friends with you? Who are you poking? ETC. Sometimes we take it too seriously. People joke about it, but we do.

I was thinking about social network friends while I was at the gym (yes, the gym. I'm really cool I promise.) There's so many, dare I say too many, social networks out there, all with varying and different purposes and "rules" to follow. It's kind of getting obscene, isn't it?

So I thought I'd post how I'm *trying* to follow the social networks. These aren't really "new," but just my opinions.
Facebook - About two weeks ago I wrote another post about how frustrated I am getting with Facebook and how it has spiraled into spam. I'm really thinking about purging most of my "friends" - people I don't talk to anymore (or ever.) I don't care what my friend count is or if I can see people's pictures of what they're up to - I'm tired of the spam. So, SO, tired.

I'd say Facebook should really only be people you know and have a decent connection with. Not someone you just met last night and may never see again. Definitely not people you've never talked to before but seen in class/work/life. Andddd I think you have to put your foot down on old high school friends or ex-flings etc. No deal. There's too much information that they can see. I'd stray away from co-workers too. Too much potential for problems. That's not how it is at where I work, but every place is different.

Oh and also - remove the "invite all" button from events, cause it's gotten so annoying.
Twitter - Simple, any and everything. BUT they have to have something interesting to say. You don't deserve to be followed by anyone if you tweet stupid stuff like "Ugh I'm so tired all day" or "I'm eating ice cream" or emo lyrics about your emotional relationship problems. Smart tweets. Conversational tweets. Sharing RELEVANT information, not worthless information. It's hard, but it makes Twitter actually worth it.
LinkedIn - It's talked about as "for professionals" but as a college student, how does that work? I won't have a big network if I exclude my peers in school, because even if I meet some "professionals" I probably will not have enough of a connection to be "linked." And who do I link to? My bosses? People working at other firms in the area? How do we classify a link. This is still very much to be determined as far as I'm concerned.

Foursquare - This one is the most interesting to me, because it's so new. What's the policy? I don't know. However, I do know that I don't really want to be friends with EVERYONE. A kid from high schol (who I NEVER spoke to) sent me a friend request on Foursquare. Why? I could care less where this kid is. I really believe this should be almost the most exclusive network of the four. I only really want to know about people who come into my day-to-day contact. I don't need to know where my freshman floor-mate is. I probably never will. So let's not be friends.

While typing this post, I just thought about the entire concept of "friending people." I've actually almost become anti-friend requesting anyone anywhere but Twitter. I don't need to be your Facebook friend for us to be friends. Just cause we work together doesn't mean we could/should be LinkedIn. I also think it's kind of weird to find someone on these networks and friend them. It crosses over from being "friends" to stalking. I've also grown cynical.

But what about when you get a friend request from someone i.e. co-worker/parent/ex/random hook up/the random person you met last night/the significant other you're seeing/the dork from high school/the quiet girl from class/AND SO ON. What do you do? When is it okay to say no? In the situation of the kid who friended me on Foursquare, I actually clicked no the first time. Then he sent it again. AGAIN. How desperately does this dude want to know where I am? That's why it's weird.

But in the situation of like Twitter, someone's said to me "why don't you follow me back" and I straight up said "because I don't find your tweets interesting." It sparked a debate, and I didn't cave in. Still don't follow that person. And their tweets still aren't interesting. Situations like that are so unbelievable and frustrating because it doesn't matter. We don't have to be friends. It won't really change my day. It's awkward to say no though. It should just be normal.

It would be really nice to just have one network. That covered everything. It could of been Facebook, but people like options & different things. Tweets are the same as Facebook updates. Facebook chat is the same as AIM/Gchat. But nothing it's not all connected. You can contact someone in 17 different ways. It's too much. It's like that scene in He's Just Not That Into You, but not in a romantic sense. Too many methods, all with too many rules.

I want to hop in the DeLorean and go back to 1985. A time when people had to talk to each other in person or over the phone instead of text. Sometimes it is just TOO much.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

OMG WHAT IS GOING ON IN LOST

It's starting to get serious. Really really serious. There's only like 300 some minutes left, and we still have SO MUCH TO FIND OUT.

Let's get started gang!!! (True Life - I'm Peter Klaven)

1) Flash sideways SLASH Desmond

Can't really figure out what is the deal here. The OT Desmond seems to be calm, collected, and care-free. He knows Locke isn't Locke.

I think (but it's a stab) is that Desmond is "aware" of the flash sideways timeline. He knows that something else is going on - and that he's the key to merging the two or some how affecting the outcome. So far, we've only seen people realize their alternate realities via near-death experiences, love, or constants.

Desmond is trying to help everyone realize their other selves. He helped Hurley follow Libby (which was such a corny storyline) and is doing something to Locke.

1.5) WHY DID DESMOND HIT LOCKE

There's a few potential reasons that I'm pondering.

a) My original thought was that the timelines are connected. If Locke dies in the flash, he dies in the original. That doesn't sync up though, because Locke is already dead. Smokie has only taken his shape, not his body. So that doesn't totally work.

b) Locke in Flash Sideways needs to remember the island, so he can become "self aware" - the best way to make that happen is to have something traumatic happen to him, similar to when his father threw him out of the building.

c) Locke will have surgery from Jack, and their touch/interaction will spark the memories of them on the island - which will then lead Jack to become Jacob, and preserve the Island.

2) The Boy

WTF. Seriously. This was a different kid than we saw in The Candidate, but imdb says it's the same actor. The hair is definitely different for a reason though. Makes me think of a young Jacob/Smokie. But Desmond saw him too - is Desmond a candidate? Or is he just special?

The boy could be Aaron, or a young Desmond. Or maybe it's the higher power that Jacob and Smokie adhere to. More on that in another post.

3) The Well

Before I talk about the well, how the hell are we seeing all these things this year that the losties never found before? The lighthouse, Smokies cave, the Temple, this new well. How does that happen? I thought Sayid was some kind of explorer.

The Well HAS to be something, but what? Smokie mentioned the electromagnetism - similar to that in the Hatch/Orchid? Can Desmond move the Island or dig deeper to find the pocket to kill Smokey? (PS - Smokey or Smokie? I can't decide. Smoke is a strange word to say. Try it.) WHICH BRINGS ME TO ANOTHER IDEA ---> When the hatch detonated, shouldn't that have done something to Smokey? It's clear he can't get past the fence, so if a large pocket of electromagnetic energy is emitted, I would think this would do something to him.

random unimportant point - can Jack Bauer just come and drop an EMP ? Wouldn't that do it?

The well has some purpose. It's not just to hold Desmond until he's out. That's foolish. I don't think it's another donkey wheel - how many of those can we have? I think it's just a temporary prison until next week.

4) The Whispers

I'm REALLY unsure about this whole thing. It supposedly can't be Smokie - so far as Ilana knows - because he's supposedly stuck in his current form. Some questions I have:
Why is Hurley the only one that can see the dead people on the island?
Why wouldn't Libby come around to talk to Hurley?
They aren't just stuck on the Island - Hurley saw Ana Lucia off the Island.
It doesn't explain Yemi.
How is Isabella on the Island?
Why was Walt able to do the same things? Where is Walt?
Where/How do these spirits determine when to come out and be visible and where do they go?
Charlie was off the island playing checkers with Hurley. How.

So I don't know what Michael is doing, but I feel like it's not legitimate. I'm not convinced the plane is the way off the Island. Last I remember, it was broken in the cockpit, probably doesn't have enough fuel, and the runway most likely isn't long enough. ALSO HOW DID BEN KNOW TO MAKE A RUNWAY IN THE FIRST PLACE - INTERESTING STUFF.

Maybe if Smokie were to leave, the dead spirits would be free as well. OR another thought - maybe Desmond ignites an electromagnetic release that would stop the plane from crashing - bringing his purpose full circle. He brought 815 here, now he would bring the plane that would destroy the world down.

So what's the point of Michael coming out now? Hurley's been back on the island for a little bit now, but then again I don't know how you count the "being in 1977" thing on the time line.

Lastly I was so souped by the Bruce references - Spanish Johnny's and Rosalita. Good work by the writers - as if I need another reason to love the show.

Monday, April 12, 2010

Conan to TBS

Well, Conan finally found a new home, and apparently it's going to be TBS, also known as Turner Broadcasting Station, also known for holding the tag line "very funny".

This move strays from the conceived thought that he would end up at Fox. I feel like Fox would have never worked out. Too many affiliates would have to rearrange their schedule to pull it off on a real risk/gamble.

I think I like the move. Certainly Conan has to go SOMEWHERE. He can't just stay on this tour. He won't make it. TBS provides him with an outlet that is relatively visible (most people have at least basic cable) and he can come in with NO expectations. Fox would want him to knock off the main broadcasting stations. He won't. He can't.

By being on TBS he gets to be a little more risky than the national channels. He can be who he was at 12:35. But at 11. Again, with no expectations, he can do whatever. If he flops, it's not an issue, if he succeeds, TBS looks like geniuses.

I'm curious to see how the deal is structured with money and years. I would think that eventually Conan would like to be back in the national spotlight (Letterman's job???) and I hope he doesn't get stuck in this deal doing that.

What is also interesting is the growth and development of cable television. Outside of the HBO/Showtime, most cable stations don't generate nationally-recognized original content. Most of their shows would be syndicated. Family Guy is on every channel. Slowly we're starting to see that shift however. Obviously the big winner is Mad Men, but there's been other great shows that are starting to develop/have developed as well, like Breaking Bad, The Shield, Nip/Tuck, etc. I think it's great - the ability of options. No longer do we have to watch shows that appeal to literally everyone because there are only 5 outlets. I can watch ESPN and you can watch TLC and both be perfectly happy. The options out there (on every outlet, not just TV) is what makes technology so great - everyone can have their niche.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

The PGA Tour Lives and Dies with Tiger

This post isn't anything new, but I just realized how much of an impact Tiger has on everyone watching. It's been around for quite a while. I've watched most of the weekend, mainly for hopes of Tiger pulling it out. As I type this, he's at -7 and 5 shots out. I don't see it.

Yet I pulled away from the TV because Tiger was melting down. Too many bogeys and poor tee shots. Then I ready a tweet that he sunk an Eagle, and I'm back in. I can only wonder how many other people are worse than I am with regards to the "Tiger Factor"

I actually spent the last five minutes thinking, what if Tiger didn't come back to play in the Masters? Would I even watch it? Would most of America? I don't know the statistical data, but I doubt it. Interesting. Very very interesting. The business side of golf/sports - how much one person can alter the income for an entire league.

There isn't one other single athlete right now who demands as much media attention as Tiger. Even before this whole thing. Whenever Tiger played, that was the story. Let's look at the comparable for other sports:
NBA - LeBron/Kobe
NHL - Ovechkin/Crosby
NFL - Tough choice, but Brett Favre gets the most attention, and then Manning/Brady
MLB - Alex Rodriguez

NONE of them get the attention that Tiger does. People watch a football game without Brett Favre in it. Nobody watches golf without Tiger. I understand the logic doesn't connect because of the differences in the sports and the local aspect (and that golf can be bloody boring to many people (I just said bloody)) of other sports for each city. I don't know of any other athlete that commands their sport or the entire sports world like Tiger. The last one I could think of would be Michael Jordan, but that was before my time.

To conclude, the PGA Tour needs Tiger. It could live without him, but I'm sure its sees at least 10x higher ratings/income when Tiger's in contention.

PS TIGER - STOP USING THE DRIVER OUt OF THE TEE BOX. IT NEVER WORKS. EVEN I KNOW THAT, AND I SUCK AT GOLF.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

The New Tiger Woods Ad and My Excitement for the Masters



So first off, this ad is nothing short of powerful. It's eerily able to capture every single emotion and feelings over Tiger's past few months. I find it a little disturbing that Earl said that while alive, and how it applies so perfectly. By Tiger saying nothing, he is trying to show what he's thinking. How he let everyone down. His father, his wife, his kids, his fans, everyone. Even Joslyn James. (Kidding.) He's getting ready to

Tomorrow is the big return to golf. I'm SO excited. I've always said, the best thing to make this go away is to do what he does best - play golf and win tournaments. I believe golf is one of the more mental games in all sports. One little miscue could make the difference between the fairway and the rough, or missing a putt. So he needs to be in the right frame of mind, and I believe he's definitely making the right steps - or at least he says he is. I'm not a rehab expert, but I believe part of the rehab is to get back into the routine of your life before you were crashing. Golf is part of his routine. Competing. At a familiar territory in Augusta. The place where we won his first Major. A place rich with history, and an opportunity for him to add another legacy to that history. Getting back in the groove.

Good luck tomorrow Tiger, I'm hoping your mind is clear enough to pull it together, and prove that you are still the best golfer to ever play the game. This is your year. Keep working on yourself and the golf will come naturally too you. You can get back on the country's good side soon enough. Don't give up.

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Internships - To Pay or Not to Pay ?

Recently, there has been a decent amount of articles regarding the legality and ethical implications of companies providing unpaid internships - typically to college students. I figured, as a college student and an intern, this is a perfect opportunity for me to chime in.

First, I suggest you read this New York Times article about the controversy.

So there's so many different aspects/issues regarding this. I do believe in the concepts of internships. There needs to be some kind of a regulation/balance though. It shouldn't just be seen as free labor. An intern should be just as important and equal as everyone else.

I've had a few internships where I've sat there and done nothing - because they told me they had nothing for me to do. Or, my duties consisted of a lot of grunt work (I liked to call it the 3S syndrome - Staple, Stamp, Send - for all the envelopes I had to send out.) There was no career related work. I know that somebody has to do that grunt work. I'm totally fine with doing it based on the premise that I will be doing something a bit more sophisticated later on.

So when my bosses would tell me they have nothing for me to do, a few days later they would get mad at me for "not going the extra mile" What extra mile? They had nothing for me. And the bosses get mad when you keep badgering them for work, so there's no happy medium.

I actually ended up having a meeting directly with my bosses at this same firm, where I told them how this particular internship wasn't what I expected it to be, and they told me I'm a valuable asset of the firm. I didn't follow. I felt as though they were trying to suck up because they realized how frustrated I was. Following that meeting, NOTHING changed.

It is hard to be inspired in an environment that won't let you learn. And it snowballs very quickly if it happens too often. I'm giving up my free time to come in, contribute, and learn - but that doesn't mean that you can treat me like my time isn't valuable and that I'm incapable of contributing. Comments like "Oh, he's just an intern" really dehumanize the position, and can easily frustrate people. In situations like social media, I probably know just as much as the employees - or maybe more. Why not let me help?

I believe some incentive needs to be offered. And not just "valuable learning experience," because that's the typical, company policy line that isn't really cutting it. It's the same as "every day here is different." I think I've heard that from every place I've interviewed. I guess it comes with the territory. But, it doesn't do any good to lie if you don't actually follow through.

So by incentive - what does that mean? It's not directly cash. Obviously an easy incentive is college credit. At BU, I don't really get college credit outside of my one 4-credit internship that is required to graduate. I can't take another internship for credit, but I wanted to keep learning (pending the firm.)

So college credit is nice, but there's also other options. Obviously, the situation may vary by firm and intern, but something valuable. Some kind of one-on-one mentoring, "classes," maybe help land the intern an interview at another firm. Something more than just "a valuable learning experience." because that's so vague that it doesn't mean anything.

The thing to consider is that many people give up their free time/summer's to participate in these internships. They could be spending this time at a random job - waiter - and make money that they actually might DESPERATELY need, instead of slaving away at a firm that isn't paid and they may not have anything for the intern to do.

I know too many people who have had internships, and, when they aren't paid, they aren't doing anything. It's because the companies have NO reason to give them work - what difference is it to them? That's the attitude that annoys me the most. It generates this tension between the interns and the employees. The interns stay on because they want something on their resume. The company gets mad because the interns "aren't going the extra mile."

That's why I want some kind of incentive to ensure that an intern and the employer have a reason for us to work together. If the company says "he's on the payroll, we need to give him something to do," then that's far better than "who cares, we're not paying him." And that allows for firms to overload on interns because - who cares? It doesn't matter! At one firm, I was one of 14 interns in a 25-man agency. That's too many. Some days, I didn't have a desk or computer, which made my tasks even more "grunty" than ever. That's a situation where internships are unethical. Why have me if you can't facilitate me? Let me go somewhere else.

The reason I enjoy my (unpaid) internship now is because they get it. While they may not always have things to do, they don't mind if I do school work or other things - it's all normal. If I have to leave early for a team meeting, it's not the end of the world (as it was at another internship.) My bosses allow me to tag along to some events and meet people. Obviously one of the other benefits that I enjoy a lot is the ability to go to to some of the local sporting events for free. There's obviously still grunt work, but it's not only grunt work. It's a healthy balance.

To conclude, I believe that unpaid internships are unethical. I'm no lawyer, I couldn't tell you if it is illegal or not. Without some sort of incentive, it's basically companies taking advantage of young, hopeful, inspired college students. It doesn't need to be financial compensation, but something to actually help enhance and launch the career of the aspiring intern.

It's just too bad this issue is coming to light as I'm hoping to get a job in the coming months and will transfer over from the intern to job side of life. I hope for the best for future interns.

Joslyn James, Go Away

On Monday, Tiger Woods held a press conference. Immediately following, Joslyn James held a similar press conference. One was broadcast on national television. The other was shown live on TMZ.com. Guess which one was which.

Joslyn James is seriously stretching this way too far. There's at least 12 people that have come forward to having an affair with Tiger - why do you have to be the loudest one? What good does it do to release Tiger's texts, show images of hotel room keys, flight confirmations, etc. ? We believe you. We believe everyone. We didn't want to - but now we do.

Today's second press conference was actually absurd. First of all, we criticized Woods for not speaking previously without a pre-mediated speech/interview, but then James can barely speak for herself. Instead, her attorney, Gloria Allred spoke, claiming Tiger owes Joslyn (and all the other people hurt) an apology - all because Tiger said text messages with content like "we'll have this forever." or "i love you."

Think about the texts for a few seconds.

How many times do you think people say that to each other, only to not say that a few months later? I believe the term for it is called a break-up. In situations where they are married, it's called divorce. I'm also almost entirely positive that it happens to just about everyone. And by "that" I don't mean cheating - I mean saying something (like 'I will always love you') and then probably a few days/weeks/months later not acting through on that - for whatever reason. It happens. It's common. People change. Emotions change. Situations change. Nothing is forever.

So instead, James and Allred are holding onto something that isn't - and probably wasn't - really there, and trying to get everyone else to care about their situation.

I think it's all a gimmick. I believe James may of had feelings for Tiger, but she's too mentally unstable to realize the situation and how it could really never work out. Tiger's got a wife and kids. He's got millions of dollars. He most likely didn't really care for her, he was just feeding her what he thought she wanted to hear so that he could get what he wanted. Sounds like most guys out there - right?

Let's be serious - James is an adult film star. There's nothing wrong with that, but I bet it's hard to "make it" in that field given the explosion of internet porn. She needs something to give her a boost. I don't know if this is it, but if that's what's going to take her to the top, she's made a name for herself. I don't know if being "the porn star that had an affair with Tiger Woods" is the label she'll want to carry the rest of her life, but she didn't ask me. Too late now.

Ultimately, she'll go back to porn. She says she's "considering" not doing it. She has to. That's all she's ever done. At the end of her "press conference" she stated that she would be "performing" at the local strip club during the week of the Masters. Way to promote yourself.

Either way, she had her time. It's over. Thanks for coming Joslyn, now go away. You aren't going to get an apology. Get back in reality, and get over it.

Monday, April 5, 2010

The iPad is AWESOME


On Saturday, the Wi-Fi version of Apple's latest gadget, the iPad, was released. As always with Apple products, the hype and coverage of this event mirrors a serious election campaign or sporting event. People were lined up outside of local Apple store's for day's on end, willing to buy the new product without knowing much about it beyond that hour long Steve Jobs announcement and a few more months of speculation.

I stopped by the Apple store on Saturday to give the machine a test drive, and wow, it's real cool. I know I posted earlier that I liked the idea but was somewhat skeptical of the device, and I still have a few gripes, but I think it's great. Think of it like ripping the screen off your laptop and using only that. A short skinny object that can do all the basic items that MOST people use computers for anyway - web browsing and general "entertainment" purposes, like music/movies/photos etc.

The iBook option is great and is going to absolutely KILL the Kindle/Nook. Why would anyone buy the Kindle (which only does books) when you can get an iPad, which can read books, AND browse the web/watch video and so on. Amazon is smart for adjusting it's Kindle program to be iPhone/iPad capable because right now - because it's library is much bigger than Apple's current library.

That's going to become the next big battle - book territory. Amazon's got the early lead, but here comes Apple, who has the ability and brand name to raise some hell. I almost think that after a year they could literally blow Amazon out of the water and it will be a joke. Interesting to watch. Also interesting is the development of periodicals and newspapers. Can they adapt & survive on this new electronic platform? I think they HAVE to if they want to survive.

The iPad is also being praised for it's great battery life - able to last well beyond the suggested 10 hours. That's awesome - a huge win for Apple. Supposedly it's all because of the new home-made chip that Apple produced, and I can't wait for them to install it on iPod/iPhone in the coming models and see their battery life increase even more.

INTERESTING SIDE NOTE - Is the iPod going to become obsolete? The iPhone is replacing it, and the iPad is another situation where the iPod may not really be the iPod anymore. I know it's a stretch, but I think that it COULD happen. At least for the "classic" model. The Nano's are cool.

I found typing to be a little difficult on the device, but I think that's because it was the first time I was using it, I was standing, and I had 20 people looking over my shoulder to try to get involved. I'm sure it's just like the other devices - takes time to adjust, but then it's as simple as ABC.

My personal favorite app was the MLB At-Bat app. Obviously as a huge baseball fan this speaks to me directly, but it feels as though it was made for the iPad. You can watch a game and pull up stats instantly, and following that, be able to watch highlights of the game or plays that just happened. Amazing.

Only two real problems problems with the iPad, and two stupid ones (one is not even its fault):

Stupid problem is memory - the biggest size is 64 gigs. Let's face it - we're becoming increasingly over-saturated with memory. 64 GB is a large amount, but we've just been so used to accommodating to more. My computer holds 250, my iPod holds 160, I have a 1 TERABYTE external hard drive. 64 just doesn't cut it in my mind. My music alone is 76.77 gigs (I'm still trying to cut it down, but I'm having separation anxiety.) If I were to add videos into the mix, that's less room to fool around with. Apps take up space etc. I'm just being selfish and I try to horde as much crap as possible.

Second stupid problem is how people anticipate using this. It won't and cannot replace the computer. It isn't the next thing in gaming (I played a few games on it - the thing is brutal. It can never replace Xbox/PS3 etc. The graphics can't compete and not having a controller is awful.) It's not going to change everything - however it will certainly change simple browsing and entertainment. You will still need a computer to do more complicated things (using programs like Adobe comes to mind specifically) and I think it would be hard to write a full out paper (or blog like this) without a real keyboard. Tablet technology is truly in it's infancy, and in a few years it will be MUCH different than now.

Now for real problems that I know will be fixed soon/in the next version. Multi-tasking. Seems like a no brainer. I don't know if this comes from a new OS update, but this would be alot easier to maneuver and operate. I'd still personally like to see a new OS all together (or more of a OS X based-OS that allows for more computer-like functionality.)

Other problem is Flash. Apple and Adobe are sticking to their guns, and I don't know who will come out on top. In the meantime we're left to deal with it, and sites that run in Flash just aren't compatible on the iPad.

Another thing I just thought of - are we sipping too much of Apple's Kool-Aid? By using their devices, we're encouraged to use something like iTunes to get our music/movies, but obviously not required. I personally don't use their "stores" at all - mainly out of copyright policy. I get frustrated when I switch computers and have to authorize it or am told I can't access it because I can't remember my password from 5 years ago. I posted earlier how I'm annoyed with the varying methods of buying video. I like watching things on DVD, but in order for me to watch it on my iTouch/iPad, I have to buy it again? That sucks. I need some more consistency (like the concept of Digital Copy that some DVDs are coming with now.) so that all my devices can work seamlessly. I understand the legal problems involved, but I refuse to pay $40 twice so I can watch Lost on DVD and on my iPad. Stop stealing my money. Get a USB port on the iPad so I can connect to a printer, don't make it so I have to send it through iTunes. Apple's starting to monopolize our technology, and I don't know how I feel about it.

Overall though, I'm excited about the iPad and the potential that it holds. It's definitely a look into the future (probably into the year 2000 with Conan.) I won't buy one quite yet - mainly because I'm looking for the 3G version, and also hoping that iPad 2.0 will be much more enhanced than 1.0 - remember the original iPod vs where we are now. I know they're already working on setting up the next one.

iDone.

Goodbye Donovan


Last night marked two great occasions. The beginning of the 2010 Season (Go Red Sox!) and the end of the Donovan McNabb era in Philadelphia.

The first isn't as big of a deal as the second. After 12 years in the city of brotherly love, we finally ran out the scape goat for all of our losses.

We've seen this coming now for over a year, since the game in 2008 where McNabb was benched at half-time in favor of the no-name (and now future starter) Kevin Kolb.

While I was never totally in love with McNabb, he was great for the city. He had many many highs and many many lows. The lows seem to outnumber the highs, because you always remember the lows more than the highs.

My personal opinion of the McNabb era: He was a bit more overrated than we understand. He is statistically the best player in Eagles history, but any time you play for 12 years, you're bound to break records that were previously set. He did more with less in terms of receivers like:

Terrance Small
Charles Johnson
Todd Pinkston
James Thrash
Freddie "Fred-Ex" Mitchell
Reggie Brown
Terrell Owens

That's just a few of the names. McNabb did do a lot with them, because outside of Terrell Owens (and this year with DeSean Jackson) he never had a really good receiver. They were always sub-par. That was Andy Reid's fault. He set up his convoluted version of the West Coast Offense where anyone that can catch the ball can play, because they would rather make 3 yard completions than 40 yard attempts or 3 yard runs.

What people I think fail to realize about Donovan was he had an excellent defense behind him. Brian Dawkins and Jeremiah Trotter were always making huge goal line stands or interceptions, and that's what helped the team the most. Donovan would get hurt and Garcia or Kolb or even Doug Pedersen could get the job done. The offense that Reid set up allows for every position player to be replaced easily - making fan loyalty towards a player a tough ritual. They could have gotten away with a random like a Matt Schaub that they could legitimately replace their QB every few years and as long as he is familiar with the system, it would yield very similar results.

The problem with Donovan is that he never stood a chance. From 1999 when fans wanted Ricky Williams (yes, the pot smoker) instead of McNabb, to the Rush Limbaugh comments, to puking during the final drive of the Super Bowl, he was constantly criticized. I believe that most of it wasn't his fault. He can't help being drafted where he was. Limbaugh will say whatever he wants. His receivers are to blame for not being where they are supposed to be. McNabb did make too many bad throws at the wrong time - too high, too low, 3rd down misses, 2 minute drills, etc, but was able to be one of the pieces of a Philadelphia team that went to many NFC title games and one Super Bowl. They were the Atlanta Braves of the NFC for quite a few years.

I hope Donovan the best in Washington (except for the two weeks we play him - which also strikes me as like a Brett Favre scenario) but I don't see it. At 33, he is definitely on the downswing of his career, and the Redskins have too many problems to really take advantage of his abilities. He's not the runner he once was. He's had a few injuries over the years, and Washington doesn't have a good enough system set up for him to win now. I'm glad he didn't end up in Oakland (also known as where careers die) but I think his career is over. He'll be remembered in 20 years as another great Eagle QB like Randall and Jaws, but for now, he's seen as the plague that's held us back, and moving on is the best thing we all can do in order to succeed for the next 12 years.

So, thanks Donovan for a great 12 years, but it's time. RIP.